From satellites to services: Financing Earth observation for public value

#
Photo by NASA via Unsplash

Authors

Earth observation (EO) – the collection of data on the Earth's surface, waters and atmosphere – can deliver high public value in partner countries. Madieye Ndour, Pauline Veron and Kjell Clarysse look at EO-enabled services that would translate observations into actionable information for planning, response and accountability.

% Complete

    Summary

    Earth observation (EO) – the collection of satellite data on the Earth's surface, waters and atmosphere – delivers public value to the EU and its partner countries. EO-enabled services translate observations into actionable information for climate planning, response and accountability, disaster risk management, food security and wider security applications. 

    While the EU and other international donors have supported investments across the EO service chain, this paper diagnoses four reasons why many EO solutions stall after pilots; 1) they are often financed as time-bound projects rather than as long-term services; 2) a payer-beneficiary mismatch exists, whereby public agencies or intermediaries pay, while citizens and smallholders benefit, creating fragmentation between demand and procurement; 3) gaps occur in terms of enabling-infrastructure and capabilities – egs. connectivity, hosting, data governance – that raise unit costs; and 4) an ‘OPEX tail’ means that services must remain operational while budgets, mandates and renewal routines are still being built.

    The key is to design credible payment and contracting architecture for multi-year services. The paper proposes three bankable operating archetypes: (1) an anchor tenant, where a public buyer contracts an EO-enabled service; (2) an intermediate aggregator, where a commercial or semi-commercial intermediary pays and bundles EO into an existing business model; and (3) a regional utility, where shared backbone capabilities lower fixed costs and support downstream service delivery.

    Lastly, the paper offers a practical toolkit. It shows how support should be sequenced over time, matches financial instruments to each archetype, and presents time-limited support to bridge the gap between project funding and durable long-term ownership.