Publications
PresentationsShopping for Raw Materials: Should Africa be Worried about EU Raw Materials Initiative?
Discussion Paper 105
14-03-2011
Ramdoo, I. 2011. Shopping for raw materials: Should Africa be worried about EU Raw Materials Initiative? (Discussion Paper 105). Maastricht: ECDPM.
Photo By VickyvS
Shopping for Raw Materials: Should Africa be worried about EU Raw Materials Initiative? Shopping for Raw Materials: from ECDPM
- 1. Shopping for Raw Materials: Should Africa be worried about EU Raw Materials Initiative? Isabelle Ramdoo – ECDPM
- 2. Structure of Presentation Part 1: The Global Debate Part 2: Should Africa worry?
- 3. Part 1: The Global Debate
- 4. Challenges facing access to RM Over the past 2 decades: Unforeseen and exponential increase in demand for RM from: Emerging countries, fuelled by their rapid eco growth, urbanisation , industrial and development needs; – Developed countries due to rapid diffusion of emerging technologies
- 5. Results…. Price of metals tripled on av. between 2002-08 Increasing pressure on supply of RM No immediate sign of physical supply shortage BUT high risk of economic shortage: Reason? Strategic RM are unevenly distributed, some key suppliers (also key users) have imposed trade restrictions Risk for jobs, competitiveness and survival of industries in resource dependent countries
- 7. Source: Raw Materials Group 2010
- 8. In response… Resource-dependent countries Strategies/ RM diplomacy to secure access to RM from abroad Maintain stocks Reduce dependency and consumption (through recycling, R&D to find substitutes) Resource-rich countries To keep their RMs for their own devt Use of export restrictions
- 9. Some key policy responses (1) EU 2008 RMI + definition of 41 strategic RM and 14 critical RMs in 2010 + new RM Initiative in 2011 Based on 3 integrated and complementary pillars: Market access (autonomous/ bilateral/ multilateral) Sustainable domestic supply Reducing EU consumption/boosting efficiency/recycling
- 10. US 2008 Study on “Minerals, Critical Minerals and the US Economy” + 2010 Critical Materials strategy. Measures: (i) Identified 11 strategic minerals; (ii) Recycling/ reuse/ efficient use of resources (iii) Development of substitutes (iv) Stockpiling of key resources (v) Need to diversify global SS chain Some key policy responses (2)
- 11. Japan 2008 guidelines for securing national resources + 2009 Strategy to ensure stable supplies of rare metals: 5 pillars: Loan guarantees to support resource acquisition projects Financing overseas field surveys Stockpiling of 7 rare metals Information gathering and dissemination on mineral availability abroad Financing research for new types of mining, exploration and recycling Some key policy responses (3)
- 12. China – two-ways strategy (both rich and dependent): Domestic: expand domestic investment; restrict foreign investment in certain key areas; use of trade restrictive measures to keep resources; International – heavy investment in key countries; financing of RM-related infrastructure and services sector Some key policy responses (4)
- 13. Part II: Should Africa Worry?
- 14. Minerals are key to Africa… 30% of world reserves of RM + produces > 60 minerals and metals + vast and unknown potential Some are major producers of key raw materials : SA 79% of PGMs DR Congo 41% of world production of cobalt Heavy reliance for some on exports of RM: Botswana – 93.5% exports to EU in diamond and nickel; Guinea: 75.7% exports to EU in aluminium and diamond; Zambia – 61.5% exports to EU in copper
- 15. BUT on average RM not the major export…
- 16. HOWEVER importance is likely to accrue… Given increasing demand for RMs Africa’s largely unexploited reserves and growing interest from all resource dependent countries Resource-rich countries’ intention to diversify sources of supply, notably away from China
- 17. Growing concerns in Africa (1) Africa’s major concern is about EU RMI (not so much about other strategies) In the corridors, most pessimistic views: RMI viewed as a means to grab resources – plunder – self interested – giving with one hand (devt) and removing with the other (trade)
- 18. Why? – EPA negotiations, countries asked to remove export restrictions. Difficult to negotiate flexibilities – Increasing perceived as being closely linked to EU’s policy to ensure undistorted access to RM; Viewed as limiting policy space for industrialisation, export diversification and value addition Has become a political issue with EU Growing concerns in Africa (2)
- 19. What implications for Africa? Initially, RMI not specifically targeted to Africa (not EU’s main source of imports) – major targets: China, Russia, Ukraine BUT, as a principle, EU likely to lead a strong battle against trade restrictive measures, independent of source or importance of the market – do not want to set precedence THEREFORE Africa will also be asked to remove restrictions
- 20. Challenges… For countries negotiating EPAs: Trade : Will be required to eliminate export taxes Challenges : Revenue loss and constraining policy space for future industrial policies. Investment : might be asked to provide market access for investment in mining and related services Challenges – While FDI is good, without proper regulatory investment frameworks and well defined industrial policies, might constrain policy space for future devt (eg for SMEs)
- 21. More apprehension from non-EPA countries RMI 2011 – “Autonomous” measures not clear – GSP? Link between trade and development (coherence) not clear as well Although governance is important, implementation is seen as quite challenging, as it requires a fundamental change in “culture” of work
- 22. Opportunities… Africa can use RMI as an opportunity Improving resource management: Financial – DRM – taxation of resources, creation of Fund – European countries experience helpful + mainstreaming resources into NIPs and RIPs Technical : seek support from EU in areas such as capacity building, institutional building, setting up regulatory framework
- 23. (ii) Strengthening states and governance RM are ownership of the state and exploitation rights are delivered by the state – important to have transparency in government revenues + expenditures + contracts Also a matter for firms: companies to disclose what they pay + code of conduct for foreign and local firms – 2011 RMI mentions that EU would work in this direction. Good opportunity to engage
- 24. (iii) Improving knowledge base and geological survey – African countries could engage discussions with EU to conduct such surveys to enable them to have a better information about the soil content (iv) Better use of local content – use domestic labour (allow transfer of technical know how); while remaining compatible with international obligations, use of locally available inputs (enhance participation of local firms – will promote forward and backward linkages) (v) Transfer of technology important to help development of indigenous enterprises
Comments
Economic Transformation and TradeBusiness and DevelopmentEU Development Policy and PracticeExtractive SectorsPresentationsRaw materialsScarcityAfrica
Leave a Reply