Making policies work

GREAT insights Magazine

CAADP at the Regional Level – State of Play in the Regional Economic Communities

17-12-2013

Vervaeke, W. 2013. CAADP at the regional level - State of play in the Regional Economic Communities. GREAT Insights, Volume 3, Issue 1. December 2013 - January 2014.

Share Button

African regional economic communities (RECs) are key to increase recognition of the importance and potential added value of regional action on agriculture. All RECs, in general, recognise agricultural development as a priority, but the manner in which regional action on this thematic area is taken forward, and the degree of progress, has differed.
 
The Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) is increasingly being used as a comprehensive tool to direct existing regional food security strategies, policies and programmes towards addressing regional agricultural challenges. Following the trailblazing example of West Africa, most RECs are now in the process of finalising or validating their regional CAADP compacts and investment plans. Experiences from the regions show that a regional approach to food security can catalyse political and investment traction, attracting important stakeholders from all sectors to the regional cooperation processes. Below we present brief summaries of the current state of play in each REC.(1)

COMESA

In October 2012, the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) adopted a roadmap on how to move towards a regional compact and investment plan. The roadmap was developed in consultation with representatives of member states, regional farmers’ organisations, the NEPAD Planning and Coordination Agency (NPCA), the African Union Commission (AUC) and development partners. The CAADP Unit of the COMESA Secretariat engages with other relevant divisions within the Secretariat and specialised regional agencies, to ensure coherence and create synergies. Due to the specificities of the COMESA region the roadmap furthermore developed a twin-track approach of developing a CAADP compact and investment plan at COMESA level, while enhanced cooperation in specific areas (e.g. production and value chain development) will be pursued together with EAC and SADC in the tripartite context. The roadmap also includes analytical work required to inform the investment plan and an agreement to establish a regional CAADP coordination group for development partners at COMESA level, in order to strengthen alignment and harmonisation of development partners’ support. To ensure effective implementation of the roadmap, the capacity of the COMESA CAADP Unit has been strengthened through the recruitment of a CAADP Regional Process Facilitator and a Policy Analyst. Following an initial review meeting in May of this year, the COMESA CAADP Compact and Investment plans were validated in September and will soon be signed by the regions’ Ministers of Agriculture.

EAC

The East African Community (EAC) developed a regional Food Security Action Plan and other initiatives geared towards regional agricultural development. This was done outside of the CAADP framework up until August 2011, when the EAC agriculture ministers mandated the EAC Secretariat to start the regional CAADP compact process. To deliver on this mandate, the EAC Secretariat developed a roadmap for the regional CAADP process in August 2012, which has been approved by the EAC Council of Ministers. To address capacity constraints of the Agriculture and Food Security Department of the EAC Secretariat, a regional process facilitator was recruited in early 2013 with the support of NPCA. The roadmap contained an ambitious timeline to develop a compact and investment plan by early 2013. A stocktaking meeting took place in Bujumbura in September 2013 to review the draft of the current compact and ensure its alignment with existing regional policies such as the EAC Food Security Action Plan. It is expected that EAC CAADP compact and investment plans will be signed in early 2014.

ECCAS

Economic Community for Central African States (ECCAS) initiated the development of a regional agricultural policy in 2008, while launching the regional CAADP process in May 2012. A meeting of the regional CAADP steering committee was held on 14-15 March 2013 to guide the preparations of a regional Round Table for the adoption of the regional compact and investment plan. Followed by a consultation workshop with Non-State Actors to collect their views on the regional policy, compact and investment plan. After this period of consultations the region adopted its CAADP compact in July 2013 and the regional investment plan was validated at the technical level in September of the same year. The ECCAS Secretariat is also seeking to set up a CAADP Development Partners’ Coordination Group at the regional level.

ECOWAS

The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) is currently implementing the region’s agricultural policy (ECOWAP) adopted in 2005 through the regional compact of 2009 and the Regional Agricultural Investment Plan (RAIP), finalised in 2010. In recent months, the region has put in place a number of multi-stakeholder task forces on specific themes (e.g. regional food reserves and value chains), in order to identify gaps and develop investment programmes to implement the RAIP and deliver on the objectives of the ECOWAP. Most progress has been made on regional food reserves, one of the key areas of regional cooperation specified in the RAIP, for which support has been mobilised, including from members of the G20. Alignment and harmonisation of development partners’ support is promoted through the regional ECOWAP/CAADP Donor Working Group, which generally is perceived by both the ECOWAS Commission and development partners as a well-functioning and useful platform. To facilitate the implementation of the RAIP, a Regional Agency for Food and Agriculture (RAFA) was launched in September 2013. This aims to address severe capacity constraints of the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development of the ECOWAS Secretariat, primarily equipped for coordination and monitoring – not implementation – of the ECOWAP/CAADP. The Agency, based in Lomé will implement initiatives that aim to translate policy instruments into concrete action, such as regional agricultural intensification and pastoralism development programme, regional market regulation programme and the social safety nets programmes. The adoption of the ECOWAS common external tariff, in October 2013, also contributes to foster regional agricultural development, with a common trade policy including for agricultural products. (2)

IGAD

The Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) launched the process of developing a regional CAADP compact in January 2012. A team of regional experts was recruited to support the IGAD Secretariat. It has organised and facilitated consultations with national stakeholders in all IGAD member states on the priority issues to be addressed in the regional CAADP compact. A regional consultative meeting with Non-State Actors followed in October 2012. It is important to note that this initiative is being developed simultaneously with the IGAD Disaster Resilience and Sustainability Initiative (IDDRSI), a scheme aiming at ending drought emergencies in the Horn of Africa by developing a mid- and long term response to current and eventual future crises. The region’s CAADP compact was validated in May 2013 and an investment plan is currently being developed.

SADC

The Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) initiated a process to develop a Regional Agricultural Policy (RAP) in 2008. For a long time the RAP and CAADP were considered to be two separate frameworks, but this perception has gradually shifted. The Ministers of Agriculture and Food Security endorsed a ‘CAADP-compatible’ RAP in June 2013. Preparations for a regional CAADP investment plan are underway.

Common challenges and shared lessons

The approach and stage of advancement in each region differs considerably. This is partly due to the mandate, priorities and the overall ambitions of the member states and respective RECs; nevertheless they face a common set of concerns and challenges.(3)

A first challenge is the need to articulate the national-regional nexus by ensuring a certain level of coherence between national and regional initiatives while respecting the principle of subsidiarity. So far the level of vertical coherence (between regional and national levels) is not sufficiently visible. Specific analyses to better articulate the coherence between national and regional compacts and agricultural policies is required to identify gaps where compacts can complement existing efforts. Indeed, the regional CAADP compacts should focus on positive spill over effects and providing synergies with member states’ national priorities. For regional integration to work, including cooperation on agriculture and CAADP at regional level, it is fundamental to better match the bottom-up regional integration processes and dynamics, which tend to be driven by the private sector and various forms of investment, with the top-down regional integration moves,such as policy frameworks and protocols that are usually driven by the governments and the public sector.

A second concern is ensuring inclusion of non-state actors, especially Farmers Organisations (FOs) and the private sector for a comprehensive multi-stakeholder approach. Here it is important to identify stakeholders that can fully participate and shape the policies by providing clear roles and responsibilities, especially when it comes to the implementation stage of the compacts. The consultation should be more than a box ticking exercise, giving ample time and proper space for the consultation processes. The experience of the West African FO, ROPPA, in shaping the ECOWAS investment plan is a good example. The formulation of a regional compact should guarantee stakeholders’ ownership and aim at gathering support for its implementation.

A third point relates to the strengthening of institutional capacity of the regional organisations to coordinate CAADP activities. While it is generally recognised that regional organisations in Africa have weak institutional capacity, most RECs have benefit from donor support to strengthen their agricultural departments. The ECOWAS Commission and COMESA Secretariat are commended by national and regional stakeholders for providing effective and timely assistance to member states with the identification of their food security needs and coordination of external support to them, especially during the national CAADP processes. In the end, political will and the ability to drive CAADP often proves the major determining factor for the success of this framework at the regional level.

Fourth, regional CAADP initiatives should be linked to efforts in other sectors, as agriculture itself is also inherently linked to other sectors. Actions and policies on regional trade, infrastructure and other related regional initiatives have direct consequences for regional food security and agricultural development. While many linkages will emerge naturally, such as in sanitary and phytosanitary regulations, agricultural trade corridors and irrigation. The first-ever joint conference of the African Union (AU) Trade and Agriculture ministers provided an opportunity to discuss these synergies and boost intra-African trade as a key to agricultural transformation with the participation of all the key policy stakeholders.

And lastly, the role and coordination of development partners (DPs) in the CAADP process needs improvement. In many RECs coordination is often still defined by ad hoc exchange of information. Several DPs finance regional programmes that contribute to agriculture but without inscribing themselves fully within the CAADP framework. Setting up (informal) coordination structures around the regional CAADP compact, incentivising harmonisation of interventions around, not only, regional agriculture and food security but also DP support in related sectors (trade, infrastructure, resource management).

As we enter the 2014 AU Year of Agriculture and Food Security, national and regional CAADP compacts and investment plans will be a reality in most RECs, and the momentum will need to shift towards the implementation stage as regional and national CAADP compacts that exist only on paper will serve no one.

This article is based on an updated version of information presented in Rampa, F., and Seters, J. van. 2013. Towards the development and implementation of CAADP regional compacts and investment plans: The state of play. ECDPM Briefing Note 49. Maastricht: ECPMD. www.ecdpm.org/bn49, and on Regional approaches to food security in Africa in the context of CAADP had been initially reviewed in a series of ECDPM Discussion Papers No 128, www.ecdpm.org/dp128.

 

Willem Vervaeke is a Junior Policy Officer of the Food Security Programme at ECDPM.

 

 

 

Footnotes

1. At the regional level the Arab Maghreb Union (AMU) and the Community of Sahel-Saharan States (CEN-SAD) have not yet launched the CAADP implementation process but many of their member states have already prepared national compacts and investment plans.
2. See Roquefeuil, Q. de. 2013. Initial reflections on the ECOWAS Common External Tariff. GREAT Insights, Volume 2, Issue 8. November 2013,www.ecdpm.org/great_2_8.
3. For more detailed presentation of key lessons for regional CAADP processes see Afun-Ogidan, D., Rampa, F. and J. Van Seters. 2012. Getting ready for take off: Lessons for regional CAADP. ECDPM Briefing Note 38. www.ecdpm.org/bn38

 

 This article was published in GREAT Insights Volume 3, Issue 1

Economic Transformation and TradeFood SecurityContinental and Regional CAADPThe Role of the Private Sector in Agriculture and Food SecurityAfrican Union Commission (AUC)AgricultureCommon Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA)East African Community (EAC)Economic Community Of West African States (ECOWAS)Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD)New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD)Regional Economic Communities (RECs)Southern African Development Community (SADC)AfricaWest Africa